HUMANOID CONTROL · ADVERSARIAL ROBUSTNESS

Still walking.
Off command.

Command-referenced observation attacks
for humanoid locomotion.

Small changes to what a robot senses can redirect its motion.
The controller stays frozen. The execution command stays unchanged.

Explore the behavior Paper temporarily unavailable
Recorded Unitree G1 simulation frames showing sustained turning in the top row and lateral motion in the bottom row.
CoRA-Match: yaw motion · CoRA-Progress: lateral motion
Recorded simulation frames from the paper, at matched timestamps.

Unitree G1 · Simulation · Bounded proprioceptive perturbations

THE BEHAVIOR

Stable locomotion.
A different trajectory.

Remaining upright is only part of reliable control. CoRA studies whether a humanoid can sustain a specified deviation from its trusted motion command.

In these experiments, the original command requests forward motion. The attack induces turning, lateral movement, or both. The framework describes general original and target command pairs.

Bird’s-eye trajectories comparing Clean, Targeted PGD, Target PPO, and CoRA on yaw and lateral targets.
Bird’s-eye trajectories from 20-second episodes. Paths share an initial position and heading. Figure 4 in the manuscript.

THE METHOD

A reference from
the controller itself.

Ask how the frozen controller would respond to the target command. Use that response to guide an observation attacker.

CoRA framework: bounded observation perturbations, frozen controller command-reference queries, measured behavioral feedback, and reference-weight annealing.
The target command replaces the command block only in a copied observation used for training queries. Open full-size diagram ↗

01 / REFERENCE

Query the desired response.

The controller provides a target-command action at the current state. CoRA-Match scores absolute agreement. CoRA-Progress scores how much of the nominal-to-reference gap is closed.

02 / LEARN

Reward the actual motion.

A learned attacker proposes observation residuals under magnitude and rate limits. Closed-loop feedback measures target motion, while regularization penalizes unstable or excessive perturbations.

03 / ANNEAL

Let the reference fade.

The reference weight decreases to zero. The final training phase optimizes the behavioral reward and regularization. Deployment uses the trained attacker without reference queries.

THE EVIDENCE

More time on target.

Compare sustained motion across three target settings.

Mean target occupancy

Share of evaluation steps satisfying motion and stability conditions.

mean target occupancy

s

mean longest uninterrupted target motion

All methods and run-to-run variation
MethodOccupancy (%) ↑Dwell (s) ↑Falls (%) ↓

Mean ± standard deviation over five runs. Each learned method uses five independently trained attackers and 100 evaluation episodes per run. Episodes last 20 s, with a 1 s warm-up. See Tables 3–5 for the complete protocol and additional metrics.

WHAT THE ABLATIONS SHOW

Guide early.
Optimize behavior throughout.

The reference supplies an action-level learning signal. Motion feedback determines whether the intended behavior is realized.

Removing motion feedback sharply reduces occupancy. Keeping the reference weight constant also reduces occupancy on both tested targets.

Component ablation · target occupancy (%) · mean ± standard deviation over three runs
Training objectiveYawLateral
Target only86.6 ± 1.885.5 ± 2.4
Full CoRA89.3 ± 0.189.9 ± 1.1
No annealing84.2 ± 2.583.1 ± 3.7
Reference only2.3 ± 3.761.2 ± 5.5

Separate ablation runs from the main comparison. Source: Table 6.

Explore the episode-level distributions
Yaw task: episode-level occupancy, dwell, and target-acquisition distributions.
Lateral task: episode-level occupancy, dwell, and target-acquisition distributions.

THE TAKEAWAY

Command adherence.
Alongside stability.

Continued locomotion can coexist with sustained behavioral deviation. Command adherence adds a complementary measure of reliability for learned robot controllers.

PROJECT DETAILS

CoRA

Command-Referenced Observation Attacks for
Behavior Hijacking in Humanoid Locomotion

Zepeng Wang1,† · Ziluo Ding2,† · Fengyi Zhang3 · Kan Yuan4 · Xiaochuan Shi1,*

1 Wuhan University
2 Beijing Innovation Center of Humanoid Robotics
3 Wuhan University of Technology
4 Shenzhen Polytechnic University

† Equal contribution · * Corresponding author

Paper temporarily unavailableRepository (restricted access) ↗

Research manuscript · 2026 · PDF access paused while the manuscript format is updated.

Research overview

CoRA learns bounded proprioceptive perturbations to induce specified humanoid motions while maintaining stable locomotion and leaving the execution command unchanged. A frozen controller supplies a target-command action reference during training. This guidance complements a reward based on measured motion and gradually decreases to zero. Comparative experiments on a simulated Unitree G1 controller show sustained behavioral deviation under bounded observation perturbations. CoRA-Match and CoRA-Progress achieve the highest mean target occupancy and longest uninterrupted target motion on the yaw and lateral tasks, respectively, among the evaluated methods.

Citation

@misc{wang2026cora,
  title = {Command-Referenced Observation Attacks for Behavior
           Hijacking in Humanoid Locomotion},
  author = {Wang, Zepeng and Ding, Ziluo and Zhang, Fengyi
            and Yuan, Kan and Shi, Xiaochuan},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Research manuscript},
  url = {https://xiaopeng-whu.github.io/CoRA/}
}